🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive policy to restrict social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples worldwide. Officials, safety advocates, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this approach will become a template for other nations.

The European Movement

In Europe, a rising group of countries are considering parallel measures.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the PM stating that phones and apps are "stealing our kids' childhood". Legislation could be passed soon.
• The Norwegian government is set to implement a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media participants. The media minister have suggested that an Australia-style ban remains "an options on the table".
• In Spain, the president has urged lawmakers to enact a law raising the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a related step, including an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Netherlands has recommended families to prevent their kids from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has adopted a symbolic resolution demanding a ban for under-16s without parental consent is granted. Even though it highlights of the "compulsive" nature of these apps, the move does not create enforceable legislation.

"An effective age barrier is a solid first step," stated one parliamentarian driving the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Eye

Across Britain, the government has not ruled out a potential ban, emphasizing that "no option is off the table" but stressing any action must be "based on conclusive evidence".

Previously, momentum built behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. However, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have expressed warnings. An organization founded by the family of a teenager who took her own life after being exposed to dangerous social media material argues that a blanket age ban might not make platforms safer and could create a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when teens turn 16.

"This ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to design products and services that are safe and suitable for children," commented a leading online safety campaigner.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

In the United States, legislation is mostly unfolding at the regional level due to country-wide inaction.

• The state of Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has signed a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a law capping under-16s to one hour of social media access per day, with additional access requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted laws mandating guardian approval for minors to create social media profiles.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from some politicians to mimic Australia's path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as improbable.

Global Views

Beyond these regions, additional countries are also taking action.

• The Malaysian government aims to ban social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

However, international agencies take a more cautious position. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "may even backfire". The agency points out that social networks can be a "vital connection" for marginalized young people and that bans should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to improve child safeguards.

As this worldwide discussion evolves, the actions of this nation and several other countries show that policymakers globally are less and less willing to stand by for platforms to self-regulate.